As part of the Erasmus+ Jean Monnet Module project, the 2026 annual debate on Climate Migration and Justice was successfully organized, bringing together students and academic staff for an engaging and thought-provoking discussion on climate-induced migration. This debate served as a platform for academic exchange and interdisciplinary dialogue.
Students from the Master of Science in Risk Management programme played an impotant role in the event, actively participating as debaters. The selected students were divided into two opposing groups, representing the alarmist and the skeptical perspectives on climate migration. Through a structured debate format that included opening statements, rebuttals, cross-examination, and audience interaction, participants explored contrasting viewpoints and demonstrated strong analytical and communication skills.
The debate was preceded by preparatory sessions in which students deepened their understanding of climate justice and migration, while also developing arguments supported by research and evidence. These sessions contributed to enhancing their critical thinking and ability to engage with complex policy issues. The event further encouraged reflection on the broader implications of climate migration for policy-making, human rights, and international cooperation.
In addition to the student participants, the debate was attended by professors and involved in the project, whose academic expertise enriched the discussion and provided valuable guidance throughout the exchange.
The debate concluded with the pro (alarmist) group declared as the winning team, distinguished by the clarity of their arguments, strong evidence-based reasoning, and persuasive delivery.
